Shirtmaker courts ACCC trouble

London-based clothing manufacturer and retailer, Charles Tyrwhitt, has paid a $10,800 penalty after being issued with an infringement notice by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), following an investigation into the company’s ‘was/now’ pricing practices.

Charles Tyrwhitt advertises men’s and wom en’s shirts and other business clothing and accessories extensively to Australian consumers online and in catalogue and printed newspaper/magazine inserts distributed within Australia. 

The ACCC issued the infringement notice because it had reasonable grounds to believe that Charles Tyrwhitt had made a false or misleading representation in relation to the ‘was’ price of a men’s ‘slim fit non-iron microspot white shirt in ‘was/now’ pricing on its website between February 2016 and March 2016, in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law.

The ACCC considered Charles Tyrwhitt’s ‘was/now’ price representation, with a ‘was’ price of $160 and a ‘now’ price of $69, falsely represented to consumers that by purchasing the shirt there would be a saving of the difference between the ‘was’ and ‘now’ prices when that was not the case because the shirt has not been genuinely offered for a reasonable period at the ‘was’ price. Charles Tyrwhitt had advertised the shirt at the ‘was’ price of $160 for a short period in a section of its website which was difficult to locate, and no consumer had ever purchased the shirt at the ‘was’ price. Charles_T.jpg

“Comparative advertising can be a powerful marketing tool but it is essential that retailers ensure that any advertised savings are real, truthful and accurate,” ACCC Commissioner Sarah Court said.

“Was/now price representations are likely to be misleading if the products have not been sold at the ‘was’ price for a reasonable period immediately before the sale or ‘now’ price is offered.”

“The ACCC’s enforcement action against Charles Tyrwhitt also serves as a reminder to overseas businesses that if they supply products to Australian consumers, they must comply with the Australian Consumer Law,” Ms Court said. 

The payment of a penalty following the issuing of an infringement notice is not an admission of a contravention of the Australian Consumer Law. The ACCC can issue an infringement notice where it has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened certain consumer protection laws.
Further information about two price comparative advertising can be found here.



Retail Voice CEO Message: 24 May 2023

It’s been another big week politically, with the Victorian Government handing down its 2023-24 State Budget. For small businesses, there’s some measures to be pleased about with the Government set

Raising awareness about National Sorry Day

As part of the ARA’s reconciliation journey, we have made a commitment to use our reach to raise awareness with our members about days of significance for First Nations communities,